News

Why AUKUS remains the right strategy for the future defence of Australia

April 24, 2025 3 min read
author Anamika Mishra [Sub Editor]

Australia’s future fleet of nuclear-powered submarines, developed under the AUKUS agreement, will significantly boost our ability to deter threats to vital maritime trade routes. By making hostile naval task forces more vulnerable, these submarines will form a powerful line of defense.
However, a coherent and robust maritime strategy requires far more than submarines alone. Key priorities must include:
• Expanding the surface combatant fleet
• Addressing vulnerabilities in resupply, mine warfare, and hydrographic vessels
• Resolving longstanding issues surrounding Australia’s strategic fleet commercial ships that could be mobilized in times of crisis
Australia must also rebuild its flagged merchant fleet by reforming the Australian International Shipping Register and establish a dedicated national coastguard to enhance domestic maritime security.

AUKUS: A Controversial Yet Crucial Step
While AUKUS has drawn criticism especially in light of the Trump administration's recent pivot from traditional alliances the three-phase submarine plan remains firmly on track. Like any major defence acquisition, AUKUS comes with risks: sustained political commitment, delivery schedules, workforce challenges, and rising costs. But these risks are being actively managed.
The key question isn’t whether risks exist, they always do in complex defence projects but whether they’re being effectively addressed. So far, the answer appears to be yes.
Political Backing Remains Strong
Despite political turbulence in the U.S., particularly on issues like Ukraine, foreign aid, and tariffs, support for AUKUS in Washington has remained steady. That’s because the agreement serves U.S. strategic interests just as much as Australia’s.

Political commitment across all three partner nations, Australia, the U.S., and the UK, has been consistent. The "optimal pathway" guiding the deal through the 2030s was finalized just 18 months after AUKUS was launched in September 2021, and a binding treaty to allow nuclear submarine technology transfer has now been enacted.
In Australia, bipartisan support has held strong for over three years.

Australia’s Value to the U.S.
Concerns about the capacity of the U.S. industrial base to supply submarines are valid, the U.S. must boost production to meet its own targets. However, Australia’s early 2030s purchase of three Virginia-class submarines is still feasible.




More importantly, Australia is not just a buyer, it’s a strategic enabler. Our role as a rotational hub for U.S. submarines and the critical support offered by facilities like the Harold E. Holt submarine communications station make us an indispensable regional partner.
Of course, future changes in global politics could alter the landscape. But for now, the alliance remains strong and beneficial to all parties involved.

Securing Australia’s Interests
Defending Australia isn’t just about protecting our shores. It’s about safeguarding our global trade routes, critical infrastructure, and national interests.
AUKUS represents a long-term shift in Australia's defence outlook, one centered on maritime power projection. By extending our reach and strengthening our undersea capabilities, we’re setting the foundation for a future where threats can be managed before they reach our doorstep.


Explore the latest edition of Journal of Supply Chain Magazine and be part of the JOSC Daily News Bulletin.

Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today.


Journal of Supply Chain is a Hansi Bakis Media brand.

Leave Comment


Next News

News

India should restore soybean exports to US in bilateral trade talks: SEA

April 22, 2025 1 min read
author Anamika Mishra [Sub Editor]
related

The Solvent Extractors Association (SEA) has called on the Indian government to prioritise the revival of organic, non-GMO soybean and soybean meal exports to the United States during the ongoing Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) negotiations.

India previously exported around 150,000 to 200,000 tonnes annually of these specialty soybean products to the US. However, this trade came to a halt following the imposition of safeguard duties by the US, triggered by concerns raised by domestic American producers.

SEA emphasized that restoring this export channel would not only support Indian soybean growers and processors but also strengthen India’s position as a reliable supplier of organic agricultural products in the global market.


Explore the latest edition of Journal of Supply Chain Magazine and be part of the JOSC Daily News Bulletin.

Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today.


Journal of Supply Chain is a Hansi Bakis Media brand.

Leave Comment

logo

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

The week’s best stories, handpicked by JOSC editors in your inbox every week.

Stay informed with exclusive content